A semiannual national survey of Chinese public opinion on international affairs. Aggregate findings are public below; raw microdata is open to verified scholars.
Aggregate findings are public. Raw microdata is available to verified scholars under a Data Use Agreement.
Key findings
Chinese Public Divided on Whether Beijing Should Seek Shared Leadership or Global Dominance
Respondents split between a preference for shared international leadership and a more assertive bid for primacy.
Shared leadership46%
Global dominance31%
Neither / unsure23%
Chinese Public Wants a Balanced Approach to the United States
A plurality favors engagement balanced with firmness rather than confrontation or accommodation alone.
Balanced engagement52%
More confrontational27%
More accommodating21%
Chinese Public Broadly Confident in China's Economy
Confidence in the domestic economy remains broad, though tempered among younger urban respondents.
Confident61%
Mixed26%
Not confident13%
Friends with Benefits: Chinese See Russia and North Korea as Beijing's Closest Comrades
Russia and North Korea rank highest on perceived closeness to China; Western states rank lowest.
Russia34%
North Korea22%
Pakistan18%
Others26%
Geopolitics Guides Chinese Public Assessment of Neighbors
Assessments of neighboring countries track alignment with Chinese strategic interests more than economics.
Favorable38%
Neutral34%
Unfavorable28%
Chinese Public Expects to be Treated as Equals in Trade
A strong majority expects reciprocity and equal standing in trade relationships with major economies.
Expect equal treatment68%
Expect disadvantage22%
Unsure10%
Data dashboard (illustrative)
The chart below illustrates the dashboard interaction; values are placeholders pending dataset connection.
Partners & method
The Carter Center · China Focus
Emory University, Dept. of Political Science
Chicago Council on Global Affairs
NORC at the University of Chicago
Editors: Nick Zeller · Yawei Liu · Renard Sexton
Researchers apply and sign a citation/usage agreement (DUA). Aggregate findings are public; raw microdata is scholar-gated.